Some 400+ workouts, each with 2-4 other heart rate sensor devices. In fact, I’d take a pretty safe wager that nobody on this planet has as many comparative workout sets (in terms of quantity of comparative HR sensor devices per workout in total) than I do with respect to Whoop. It doesn’t even let those two Whoop pillars of functionality (training & sleep) mix much in its grading of your results for each pillar.įor those semi-long-time readers, you’ll know I started testing the previous generation Whoop 3.0 nearly two years ago. It’s not a daily step counter, nor a smartwatch with a display, nor an activity tracker. Stepping back to basics though, Whoop’s purpose in life is to try and figure out whether or not you’re training too much or too little, and whether or not you’re sleeping too much or too little. Inversely, if it’s accurate – then we can dive deeper into whether there’s value in the greater Whoop platform, given its pricing of $30/month (albeit substantially less if you buy it in 12 or 18-month chunks). Thus, if that heart rate sensor is inaccurate – absolutely nothing else in Whoop’s app matters. See, the entirety of Whoop as a platform revolves around that heart rate sensor. But the real difference you (should) actually care about is the change to the heart rate sensor itself. Sure, it now includes both skin temperature as well as SpO2 sensors. While the new Whoop 4.0 looks physically similar to the previous 3.0, it’s a significantly different beast of hardware. It’s been a few months since Whoop announced their new Whoop 4.0 sensor, and after enough use for me to call this review ready – it’s time to dive (deep) into the details.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |